This learning article is currently available in English. It is not published as a translated page.
Radical derivatives
Derivative of √x: Formula, Domain, and x=0
The square-root function exists at zero, yet its finite ordinary derivative does not. This separates the function domain from the derivative domain.

Direct answer
Over the reals √x exists for x≥0, but this finite derivative requires x>0.
When to use derivative of sqrt(x)
Choose the method from the top-level mathematical structure before manipulating symbols. Conditions are part of the task, not optional notes.
Ask first 1
Which structure controls the method?
What to do
Use power and chain rules, then inspect the radicand and denominator domains.
Ask first 2
Which condition can change the answer?
What to do
Over the reals √x exists for x≥0, but this finite derivative requires x>0.
Ask first 3
How should the result be checked?
What to do
Record where the radicand is defined and where the derivative denominator is nonzero.
Rationalize the difference quotient
Begin with [√(x+h)−√x]/h.
Multiply by the conjugate over itself.
The numerator becomes h and cancels, leaving 1/[√(x+h)+√x].
The limit is 1/(2√x) for x>0; at zero the right-hand slopes have no finite limit.
Worked examples
Valid for x>0.
The radicand stays positive.
Require 3x+1>0 for a finite derivative.
Common mistakes
- • Missing 1/2.
- • Forgetting the radicand derivative.
- • Claiming the formula is finite at zero.
- • Replacing √(x²) with x instead of |x|.
Error clinic: locate the first invalid step
Incorrect attempt
Why it fails
The coefficient 1/2 is missing.
Correction
Incorrect attempt
Why it fails
The radicand derivative 2x is missing.
Correction
Practice the same idea with a changed structure
Name the rule and its conditions before revealing the reference answer. Explain every sign and factor.
Check before solving
The radicand stays positive.
Reveal the reference answer
Reference answer
Check before solving
Require 3x+1>0 for a finite derivative.
Reveal the reference answer
Reference answer
Try the worked examples in the calculator
Each link opens the matching calculator with the expression, variable and required conditions already filled in.
Open the calculator without a preset: DerivadasFrequently asked questions
Why not differentiable at zero?+
The right-hand secant slopes grow without a finite bound.
Can a root derivative exist where its radicand is zero?+
Sometimes after simplification, but the direct formula requires separate analysis there.
Is √(x²)=x?+
Over the reals it is |x|, not x for negative inputs.
Conclusion
Treat √x as a power, multiply by the inner derivative, and distinguish x≥0 from the derivative condition x>0.
Compare usage plans